DAY 2 QUIZ

Test

Parties jouées 1 %Précision 0 Temps moyen 00:07

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

CRVS 101 and 201 TRAINING

Créé par

Jerson Batan

Philippines

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

#	Jeux	Précision	temps
1	Jerson Batan 7 Septembre 2026	% 0	00:07

Voulez-vous apparaître dans le Top 10 de ce jeu? Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

Spanish Alphabet Listening

Falkenberg Falkenberg

United States

(88)

Spanish alphabet, listening-based assessment
Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations

Benjamin D Morgan

United States

(14)

Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations
Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz

Benjamin D Morgan

United States

(39)

Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz
UPS 5 Seeing Habits Quiz

Heather Bell

United States

(12)

Test your knowledge about the 5 seeing habits discussed in the text 'UPS 5 seeing habits'.
Tissues - Practice Quiz

Benjamin D Morgan

United States

(16)

Tissues - Practice Quiz

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Imprimez votre jeu

DAY 2 QUIZ


DAY 2 QUIZVersion en ligne CRVS 101 and 201 TRAINING par Jerson Batan 1 An audit review identifies a discrepancy in a transaction. The employee's explanation appears reasonable, but system logs show activity inconsistent with the explanation. a Give greater weight to the employee's explanation because it provides context that system records may not capture. b Treat the system logs as conclusive evidence because electronic records are more reliable than statements. c Examine both sources and obtain additional evidence before reaching a conclusion. d Presume that the discrepancy resulted from unauthorized activity until the employee proves otherwise. 2 A senior official instructs an employee to skip a verification procedure for a transaction involving an important stakeholder. The official states that the transaction is legitimate and that the verification can be completed later. What is the strongest fraud-management response? a Follow the instruction because the official assumes responsibility for the decision. b Complete the transaction but document that the verification was waived by management. c Seek confirmation through the prescribed authority and ensure that any exception is properly authorized and documented. d Refuse the transaction immediately and report the official for suspected fraud. 3 An employee has access to sensitive information, handles high-value transactions, and works with minimal supervision. No irregularity has been identified. Which conclusion is most appropriate? a The employee presents a high fraud risk and should therefore be investigated. b The employee's access represents an inherent fraud risk that should be addressed through appropriate controls. c The employee should be reassigned because lack of supervision indicates probable misconduct. d The absence of an identified irregularity means there is no meaningful fraud risk. 4 Due to staffing limitations, one employee currently performs transaction preparation and recording. Management proposes that the employee's supervisor review a monthly summary instead of implementing separate transaction-level review. Which statement is most accurate? a Monthly supervisory review completely compensates for the lack of segregation of duties. b The arrangement is acceptable because the employee and supervisor are in different positions. c The compensating control may reduce risk, but its effectiveness depends on whether the review is sufficiently independent, timely, detailed, and documented. d Segregation of duties is unnecessary when employees have worked in the office for many years. 5 Two employees have access to different stages of a transaction. An irregularity is discovered that could not have been completed by either employee acting alone. What should this finding prompt management to consider? a Whether the system malfunctioned, since two employees could not have independently caused the irregularity. b Whether the existing controls are sufficient to detect coordinated actions between employees. c Whether both employees should automatically be considered responsible. d Whether access privileges should be removed from all employees.

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

DAY 2 QUIZ

Test

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Test

Spanish Alphabet Listening

Test

Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations

Test

Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz

Test

UPS 5 Seeing Habits Quiz

Test

Tissues - Practice Quiz

DAY 2 QUIZVersion en ligne

par Jerson Batan

An audit review identifies a discrepancy in a transaction. The employee's explanation appears reasonable, but system logs show activity inconsistent with the explanation.

A senior official instructs an employee to skip a verification procedure for a transaction involving an important stakeholder. The official states that the transaction is legitimate and that the verification can be completed later. What is the strongest fraud-management response?

An employee has access to sensitive information, handles high-value transactions, and works with minimal supervision. No irregularity has been identified. Which conclusion is most appropriate?

Due to staffing limitations, one employee currently performs transaction preparation and recording. Management proposes that the employee's supervisor review a monthly summary instead of implementing separate transaction-level review. Which statement is most accurate?

Two employees have access to different stages of a transaction. An irregularity is discovered that could not have been completed by either employee acting alone. What should this finding prompt management to consider?