Research Detectives: Source Evaluation

Froggy Jumps

Parties jouées 1 %Précision 0 Temps moyen 00:12

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Identify suitable sources for qualitative research

Créé par

Angel Grace Indino

Philippines

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

#	Jeux	Précision	temps
1	Angel Grace Indino 7 Août 2026	% 0	00:12

Voulez-vous apparaître dans le Top 10 de ce jeu? Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Imprimez votre jeu

Research Detectives: Source Evaluation


Froggy Jumps Research Detectives: Source EvaluationVersion en ligne Identify suitable sources for qualitative research par Angel Grace Indino 1 Source A (peer‑reviewed article, 2024) about Academic Stress among seniors: Is this generally appropriate for qualitative research on lived experiences? a Use it b Don't use it c Maybe 2 Source B: A Facebook post sharing a personal opinion. Is this source appropriate for a qualitative review on student stress? a Use it b Maybe c Don't use it 3 Source C: A personal blog describing a student's daily experiences. Could this be used with caution for qualitative insights? a Use it b Don't use it c Maybe 4 Source D: A master's thesis on Coping Mechanisms of Senior High School Students. Should this be used as a scholarly source in reviews? a Maybe b Don't use it c Use it 5 What makes a source appropriate for research? a Reliability, relevance, and credibility b Only popularity c Low effort and bias 6 Should every source found on the internet be included in the Review of Related Literature? Why or why not? a Yes, include all online sources b Only include peer‑reviewed sources c No, assess credibility and relevance first 7 Which of these is a reason to distrust a source? a Open access for transparency b Clear abstract and references c Lack of author credentials or data verification 8 Which source type is generally strongest for qualitative themes about lived experiences? a Personal social media post b Peer‑reviewed scholarly article c Anonymous blog 9 Can a master’s thesis be considered credible evidence for a literature review? a Only if it’s recent b Yes, if well‑documented and peer‑reviewed elsewhere c No, never 10 If a source has strong methodology but outdated data, how should it be treated? a Ignore the methodology b Use with caution and note date limitations c Always exclude it

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Research Detectives: Source Evaluation

Froggy Jumps

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Froggy Jumps

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos Quiz

Froggy Jumps

Phlebotomy Order of Draw Quiz

Froggy Jumps

pizza

Froggy Jumps

The Integumentary System

Froggy Jumps

Bill of Rights Game - The Constitutionalist

Froggy Jumps

Research Detectives: Source EvaluationVersion en ligne

par Angel Grace Indino

Source A (peer‑reviewed article, 2024) about Academic Stress among seniors: Is this generally appropriate for qualitative research on lived experiences?

Source B: A Facebook post sharing a personal opinion. Is this source appropriate for a qualitative review on student stress?

Source C: A personal blog describing a student's daily experiences. Could this be used with caution for qualitative insights?

Source D: A master's thesis on Coping Mechanisms of Senior High School Students. Should this be used as a scholarly source in reviews?

What makes a source appropriate for research?

Should every source found on the internet be included in the Review of Related Literature? Why or why not?

Which of these is a reason to distrust a source?

Which source type is generally strongest for qualitative themes about lived experiences?

Can a master’s thesis be considered credible evidence for a literature review?

If a source has strong methodology but outdated data, how should it be treated?