Relier Pairs Text Structures and Language Techniques - MatchingVersion en ligne Match terms with their definitions. par Taylor Minor 1 Loaded Words 2 First Person 3 Third-Person Omniscient 4 Connotation 5 Cause and Effect 6 Figurative Language 7 Transition Words 8 Main Idea 9 Enumeration Order 10 Third Person 11 Organizational Structure 12 Pronoun 13 Point of View 14 Summary 15 Chronological Order 16 Order of Importance 17 Compare and Contrast 18 Third-Person Limited 19 Second Person 20 Sequential Order 21 Spatial Order 22 Signal Words 23 Generalization 24 Problem and Solution Words or phrases that help readers identify how ideas are connected. Examples: because, however, first, finally, similarly. A brief retelling of the most important ideas and events without unnecessary details. Words or phrases that connect ideas and guide readers through a text. A structure that examines similarities and differences between two or more things. The feelings, associations, or implied meanings connected to a word. Organizing steps or events in the order they should occur. Organizing ideas from least to most important, or most to least important. A word that takes the place of a noun, such as he, she, it, they, or we. Organizing events by the order in which they happened in time. A point of view using you. It directly addresses the reader. A point of view using he, she, they, or character names. Language that goes beyond literal meaning to create imagery, comparison, emphasis, or effect. The perspective from which a story or text is told. The way an author arranges ideas in a text. A point of view using I, me, we, or us. The narrator is part of the story. Organizing information as a list of points, reasons, examples, or details. A narrator who follows the thoughts and feelings of one main character. A narrator who knows the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters. A structure that explains why something happened and what happened as a result. A broad statement or conclusion about a group, topic, or category based on examples or evidence. Strongly emotional words chosen to influence how an audience feels about a topic. A structure that presents an issue and explains one or more ways to solve it. The most important point or central message of a text or section. Organizing details by location, position, or physical arrangement. 1 Ergo Propter Hoc 2 Subheading 3 Appeal to Authority Fallacy 4 False Analogy / False Causation 5 Heading 6 Graphic Organizer 7 Red Herring Fallacy 8 Glossary 9 Bibliography 10 Index 11 Bandwagon Fallacy 12 Caption 13 False Equivalence Fallacy 14 Staw Man Fallacy 15 Footnote 16 Works Cited 17 Post Hoc Fallacy (False Cause) 18 Hasty Generalization Fallacy 19 Preface 20 Fallacy 21 Graphic Features 22 Logical Fallacy 23 Ad Hominem Fallacy 24 False Dilemma (Either/Or) Fallacy 25 Equivocation 26 Slippery Slope Fallacy 27 Abstract (Scientific Publication) 28 Parenthetical Citation (In-Text) 29 Table of Contents 30 Circular Reasoning Fallacy A title that tells what a section of text is about. Claiming that one small action will automatically lead to a chain of extreme negative events. Brief text that explains a photograph, chart, illustration, or other visual. A citation placed in parentheses within a sentence to show where information came from. A weak comparison between things that are not alike in important ways, or an incorrect claim that one event caused another. Visual elements such as charts, graphs, maps, diagrams, photographs, and timelines that help explain information. Making a broad conclusion based on too little evidence or too few examples. Treating someone7s opinion as proof simply because they are famous, powerful, or respected, even when they are not qualified. An error in reasoning that makes an argument weak or misleading. An alphabetical list near the end of a book that tells where specific topics appear. A list of the sources actually cited in a paper or project. A visual tool used to organize ideas, information, comparisons, or relationships. Claiming something is true, good, or right because many people believe or do it. A list of chapters or sections and the pages where they begin. A list of important terms and their definitions, usually found near the end of a book. Treating two things as equal even though important differences exist between them. A flawed pattern of reasoning that may sound convincing but does not logically prove a claim. Using a word with more than one meaning in a misleading way. Assuming that because one event happened after another, the first event caused the second. A list of sources used or consulted during research. A note or citation placed at the bottom of a page that gives extra information or identifies a source. Misrepresenting or oversimplifying someones argument so it is easier to attack. Using the claim itself as its own evidence. Attacking a person instead of addressing that person7s argument. Pretending there are only two choices when other options exist. An introductory section, often written by the author, that explains the purpose or background of a book. A short summary at the beginning of a research article that explains the studys purpose, methods, findings, and conclusion. Faulty reasoning that assumes something must be true or caused by something else simply because it seems connected. Introducing an unrelated issue to distract from the real argument. A smaller heading that divides a larger section into more specific parts. 1 Tone (ELA) 2 Author’s Purpose 3 Audience (Rhetorical Situation) 4 Logical Appeal / Logos 5 Rhetorical Appeal 6 Emotional Appeal / Pathos 7 Author’s Attitude Persuasion through facts, evidence, statistics, examples, and reasoning. A method an author uses to persuade or influence an audience. The specific person or group an author is trying to reach. The author’s feelings or viewpoint toward the topic or audience. The attitude or mood an author communicates through word choice and style. The reason an author creates a text, such as to inform, persuade, entertain, explain, or inspire. Persuasion through emotions such as fear, sympathy, pride, anger, hope, or guilt. 1 Realized User Image 2 Rhetorical Question 3 Desired User Image 4 Mode of Rhetoric 5 Argumentative Writing 6 Persuasive Writing 7 Argumentation The kind of person the author wants the audience to see themselves as being. A broad way of communicating for a purpose, such as narration, description, exposition, or argumentation. Writing that takes a position on an issue and supports that position with evidence. The identity or role the audience actually adopts or sees in themselves after responding to the text. Writing or speaking that makes a claim and supports it with evidence and reasoning. Writing meant to convince an audience to believe, think, or do something. A question asked for effect rather than because the author expects an answer. 1 Criticism 2 Informative / Explanatory Writing 3 Narration 4 Claim (Argumentation) 5 Thesis Statement 6 Description 7 Exposition Writing that uses details and sensory language to help readers picture a person, place, object, or experience. Writing that teaches, explains, or gives information about a topic. Analysis and evaluation of a text, work of art, idea, or performance. The central claim or main argument of an essay. Writing that tells a story or explains events in sequence. A statement that expresses a position, belief, or argument that needs support. Writing that explains or provides factual information about a subject. 1 Testimonial 2 Claim and Refutation 3 Evidence (Argumentative Writing) 4 Expert Opinion 5 Appeal to Authority 6 Evidence Sufficiency 7 Relevant Evidence 8 Controversial Evidence that directly connects to and supports the claim being made. A statement from a person who recommends, supports, or describes personal experience with something. Using a qualified expert or trusted source to support an argument. A statement or judgment from someone with specialized knowledge or experience in a topic. Facts, examples, quotations, data, or details used to support a claim. Likely to cause disagreement because people have strong opposing opinions about it. A strategy where a writer presents an opposing claim and then explains why it is weak, incomplete, or incorrect. Whether there is enough strong evidence to fully support a claim.
