Justice in Context

Froggy Jumps

Parties jouées 1

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

This short decision-making game explores what life and justice could look like in different moments in Canadian history. You will be presented with realistic situations inspired by experiences of women facing dangerous and violent relationships. For each question, choose the option that best reflects what you think could happen or what you believe is most realistic.

The purpose of this game is not to find a “right answer,” but to highlight how laws, social attitudes, and understandings of safety have changed over time in Canada. Your choices will help introduce the ideas behind historical cases like Angelina Napolitano and Angelique Lavallee, and how they connect to the development of self-defence law

Créé par

Wendy

Canada

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Imprimez votre jeu

Justice in Context


Froggy Jumps Justice in ContextVersion en ligne This short decision-making game explores what life and justice could look like in different moments in Canadian history. You will be presented with realistic situations inspired by experiences of women facing dangerous and violent relationships. For each question, choose the option that best reflects what you think could happen or what you believe is most realistic. The purpose of this game is not to find a “right answer,” but to highlight how laws, social attitudes, and understandings of safety have changed over time in Canada. Your choices will help introduce the ideas behind historical cases like Angelina Napolitano and Angelique Lavallee, and how they connect to the development of self-defence law par Wendy 1 You have experienced repeated violence in your home over time. When you think about self-defence, what matters most legally (based on 1911 laws)? a The full history of what happened b Only what is happening at that exact moment c Your emotions and fear 2 In the Napolitano case, why was past abuse not considered important in court? a It was not proven b The law did not recognize it as relevant c The jury ignored it 3 In early 1900s Canada, domestic violence was mostly seen as: a A public crime b A private family issue c A police enmergency 4 In the Lavallee case, what was introduced into court for the first time? a Physical evidence only b Expert psychological testimony c Eyewitness video footage 5 What did “battered woman syndrome” help explain in court? a Why someone might stay in a relationship b Why life threatening can exist even without immediate danger c Why crimes happen randomly 6 What is the biggest difference between Napolitano’s trial and Lavallee’s case? a The type of weapon used b The legal system understood context in 1990 c The location of the trials 7 Today in Canada, self-defence law considers: a The full context, including history and relationship b Only police reports c Only the final moment of the incident 8 What changed Napolitano's sentence later? a New evidence in court b A new law was passed immediately c Public petitions and public pressure

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Justice in Context

Froggy Jumps

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Froggy Jumps

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos Quiz

Froggy Jumps

Bill of Rights Game - The Constitutionalist

Froggy Jumps

The Integumentary System

Froggy Jumps

Phlebotomy Order of Draw Quiz

Froggy Jumps

pizza

Froggy Jumps

Justice in ContextVersion en ligne

par Wendy

You have experienced repeated violence in your home over time. When you think about self-defence, what matters most legally (based on 1911 laws)?

In the Napolitano case, why was past abuse not considered important in court?

In early 1900s Canada, domestic violence was mostly seen as:

In the Lavallee case, what was introduced into court for the first time?

What did “battered woman syndrome” help explain in court?

What is the biggest difference between Napolitano’s trial and Lavallee’s case?

Today in Canada, self-defence law considers:

What changed Napolitano's sentence later?