Advanced Conditionals in Legal Context

Compléter

Parties jouées 2

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Fill in the Gaps

Créé par

ar ar

Estonia

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

COMPLETE THE LYRICS OF SONG

Loren Ramos

Colombia

(48)

Complete the lyrics of the song with the words that appear on the right side
FFA Creed Paragraph 3

Courtney Elledge

United States

(8)

FFA Creed Paragraph 3
The Preamble

Nickolas Wanamaker

United States

(69)

Fill in the blanks to complete the Preamble.
Anatomy quiz

Douglas Christie

United Kingdom

(4)

Fill in the missing words in this quiz concerning the Anatomy page of the website. You should read through the passage provided, and click the word you think fits from the list at the side. If you ...
FFA Creed Paragraph #2

Hannah Horak

United States

(8)

Creed Paragraph #2

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Advanced Conditionals in Legal Context

Compléter

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Compléter

COMPLETE THE LYRICS OF SONG

Compléter

FFA Creed Paragraph 3

Compléter

The Preamble

Compléter

Anatomy quiz

Compléter

FFA Creed Paragraph #2

Compléter

Advanced Conditionals in Legal ContextVersion en ligne

par ar ar

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%


Compléter Advanced Conditionals in Legal ContextVersion en ligne Fill in the Gaps par ar ar 1 the company complied with safety regulations , the accident would not have occurred . Liability would have arisen the defendant ? s negligence . the contract been properly executed , the parties would be bound by its terms . Had the witness not provided false testimony , the court reconsidered its verdict . If it weren ? t the lawyer ? s intervention , the client would have suffered significant losses . Were the agreement enforceable , the parties could claim damages . The claimant would not have suffered any harm ? t the breach of duty . the employee followed the safety protocols , no injury would have occurred . Had the party not acted negligently , the company faced liability . Should the client require assistance , the lawyer respond immediately . 2 Had the person , the accident would not have happened . If the company , the client would not have been upset . Were the evidence , the judge could have made a different decision . Had it not been the manager ? s help , the project would have failed . Should the witness important information , the lawyer must know immediately . But for the failure watch the workers , the accident would not have happened . Had the people the agreement correctly , the problem would not have started . Were the rules , mistakes would not have happened . If the worker the safety rules , the scaffolding would not have fallen . Had the client about the problem , they would have complained sooner .