Round Table Debate: Argument Evaluation

Test

Parties jouées 0

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Assess arguments in a discussion

Créé par

Dilfuza

Uzbekistan

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Imprimez votre jeu

Round Table Debate: Argument Evaluation


Round Table Debate: Argument EvaluationVersion en ligne Assess arguments in a discussion par Dilfuza 1 What is the main goal when presenting an argument in a discussion? a To support a claim with reasons and evidence b c d 2 Which component is the conclusion in an argument? a The supporting data only used as evidence b The counterargument presented c The list of sources used d The claim the arguer aims to prove 3 Which is a sign of weak evidence? a Citing peer-reviewed studies b Using multiple credible sources c Relying on vague anecdotes d Providing quantified data 4 What does 'appeal to authority' rely on? a Independent peer review b Universally accepted facts c An authority's status rather than evidence d Direct experimental results 5 Which fallacy is shown by attacking the opponent instead of the argument? a Slippery slope b Straw man c Post hoc d Ad hominem 6 What describes confusing correlation with causation? a Assuming one thing causes another because they occur together b Using a random sample for data c Proving causal links with experiments d Distinguishing cause from effect clearly 7 Which strategy strengthens an argument? a Ignoring counterpoints b Anticipating objections and addressing them c Overgeneralizing conclusions d Avoiding data that contradicts the claim 8 What is a straw man fallacy? a Misrepresenting an opponent's position to attack it b Presenting only strong evidence c Concluding from insufficient data d Using irrelevant but true facts 9 Why is evidence quality important in a debate? a Evidence is optional in arguments b Low-quality evidence is enough c Quality of evidence does not affect credibility d Higher-quality evidence makes conclusions more credible 10 What should you do after presenting your argument? a End the discussion without feedback b Make new claims without justification c Invite questions and consider counterarguments d Dismiss opposing views as irrelevant

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Round Table Debate: Argument Evaluation

Test

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Test

Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz

Test

Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations

Test

Tissues - Practice Quiz

Test

Spanish Alphabet Listening

Test

UPS 5 Seeing Habits Quiz

Round Table Debate: Argument EvaluationVersion en ligne

par Dilfuza

What is the main goal when presenting an argument in a discussion?

Which component is the conclusion in an argument?

Which is a sign of weak evidence?

What does 'appeal to authority' rely on?

Which fallacy is shown by attacking the opponent instead of the argument?

What describes confusing correlation with causation?

Which strategy strengthens an argument?

What is a straw man fallacy?

Why is evidence quality important in a debate?

What should you do after presenting your argument?