Créer jeu
Télécharger
Téléchargement SCORM
A utiliser dans un LMS (Moodle, Blackboard...)
Téléchargement régulier
Pour être publié sur un site Web ou un blog.
Le téléchargement du jeu est une fonctionnalité exclusive pour les utilisateurs avec un Plan Académique ou un Plan Commercial.
Obtenez votre Plan Académique ou Plan Commercial dès maintenant et commencez à intégrer vos jeux dans votre LMS, votre site Web ou votre blog.
Obtenir Plan Académique
Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez télécharger une jeu de test ici et tester son intégration:
Partager le jeu
Video Quiz
Video Quiz

The Argument Detective

Intégrez-le à votre plateforme
G. Classroom M. Teams
Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.
Télécharger
Vous avez dépassé le nombre maximum de jeux que vous pouvez intégrer à Google Classroom avec votre Plan actuel.

Pour intégrer autant de jeux que vous le souhaitez dans Google Classroom, vous avez besoin d’un Plan Académique ou un Plan Commerciel.

Obtenir Plan Académique
Vous avez dépassé le nombre maximum de jeux que vous pouvez intégrer à Microsoft Teams avec votre Plan actuel.

Pour intégrer autant de jeux que vous le souhaitez dans Microsoft Teams, vous avez besoin d’un Plan Académique ou un Plan Commerciel.

Obtenir Plan Académique
Le téléchargement du jeu est une fonctionnalité exclusive pour les utilisateurs avec un Plan Académique ou un Plan Commercial.

Obtenez votre Plan Académique ou Plan Commercial dès maintenant et commencez à intégrer vos jeux dans votre LMS, votre site Web ou votre blog.

Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez télécharger une jeu de test ici et tester son intégration:

Obtenir Plan Académique

The Argument Detective

Video Quiz

Parties jouées 2
Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

The Argument Detective is an interactive video quiz designed for Year 10 IGCSE Global Perspectives students. Based on the StarTalk video "How to Tell What’s Real Online," the quiz challenges students to apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the reliability of digital information.

As "detectives," students must listen for "red flags" and "yellow flags" in Neil deGrasse Tyson's explanation. The activity focuses on identifying key exam concepts such as Vested Interest, Bias, Cherry-picking, and Inadequate Evidence.

Créé par

Thian Pik Hang
Thian Pik Hang
Malaysia

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu
Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu
Créer un défi

Top Jeux

 %
Anonyme
Anonyme
 %
%
%
Vous avez dépassé le nombre maximum de jeux que vous pouvez imprimer avec votre Plan actuel.

Pour imprimer autant de jeux que vous le souhaitez, vous avez besoin d’un Plan Académique ou un Plan Commerciel.

Obtenir Plan Académique
Imprimez votre jeu
The Argument Detective
 

The Argument DetectiveVersion en ligne

The Argument Detective is an interactive video quiz designed for Year 10 IGCSE Global Perspectives students. Based on the StarTalk video "How to Tell What’s Real Online," the quiz challenges students to apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the reliability of digital information. As "detectives," students must listen for "red flags" and "yellow flags" in Neil deGrasse Tyson's explanation. The activity focuses on identifying key exam concepts such as Vested Interest, Bias, Cherry-picking, and Inadequate Evidence.

par Thian Pik Hang
QR
1

Tyson mentions checking if his own views influence his research. This is:

2

Someone defending an industry they work in has a "yellow flag" due to:

3

If a source tells you "how you should feel" rather than giving data, it is:

4

Using 90 seconds of a 2-hour talk to change the meaning is an example of:

5

Tyson says a result "might prove to be true" after more research. This is:

6

Using one disproven study while ignoring hundreds of others is:

7

Claiming a "conspiracy" exists to fill a gap where data is missing is a flaw in:

8

Claiming that "mainstream" views are a secret "cover-up" is often:

9

Indicting an entire demographic (e.g., "The Jews" or "The Blacks") is:

10

Saying "I hate Big Pharma" treats a whole industry as a "monolith." This is:

11

Claiming one invention will "render an entire industry obsolete" is:

12

Claiming aliens exist based only on "fuzzy video" or "eyewitnesses" is:

13

Evaluating all evidence to reach a logical conclusion is called:

Explanation

Bias is an unfair preference or a one-sided view. It’s a "yellow flag" because it means the researcher might be ignoring evidence that contradicts their personal feelings.

Vested Interest occurs when someone has a personal or financial motive (like a job or money) to support a specific idea. This makes their neutrality questionable.

A Fact can be proven, but an Opinion is a belief or feeling. If the author is trying to "hand you" their feelings, they are trying to persuade you emotionally, not logically.

This is also known as "quoting out of context." By selecting only a small part, the author hides the full picture to support their own view.

A Prediction is a claim about what will happen in the future. It isn't a fact yet because it hasn't been proven true in the present.

Cherry-picking is a flaw where someone intentionally "picks" only the data that helps them and ignores the vast majority of evidence that goes against them.

A Reasoned Argument should follow a logical path: Evidence → Explanation → Conclusion. Using a "conspiracy" to jump to a conclusion is a logical leap.

Discussing how the word "mainstream" is often used to make personal views seem like hidden truths. He points out that if a person on social media claims, "mainstream is wrong and they're suppressing my view which is correct," it is a clear sign that they are trying to push their personal perspective as a hidden truth.

Generalisation takes a small observation and applies it to every person in a group. It is a weak argument because it ignores individual diversity.

Like demographics, lumping an entire Industry together as if they all act the same is a generalisation that ignores companies with different moral codes.

Exaggeration (Hyperbole) makes something sound much bigger or more important than it really is to manipulate the reader's sense of urgency.

Highlighting that "eyewitness testimony" or "fuzzy videos" are not sufficient proof for extraordinary claims. In IGCSE terms, eyewitness testimony is often considered anecdotal evidence, which is a form of inadequate evidence because human memory is unreliable and cannot be verified by others. Tyson’s point is a great way to teach students about proportionality in evidence. If a source makes a massive claim (e.g., "This new technology will save the world"), but only provides a single person's story as proof, the student should identify this as inadequate evidence because the proof is too weak for the size of the claim.

A Reasoned Judgment is the goal of Global Perspectives. It is a conclusion reached by looking at all facts, acknowledging bias, and following logic.

 
Voulez-vous vraiment quitter la page ?

En quittant la page, vous perdrez la progression du jeu.