Normal vs Deaf: Primary School Achievements

Oui ou Non

Parties jouées 0

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Comparing outcomes in young learners

Créé par

rimmi gupta

India

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi


Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsVersion en ligne Comparing outcomes in young learners par rimmi gupta 1 The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students. Yes No 2 Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups. Yes No 3 Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education. Yes No 4 Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms. Yes No 5 Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils. Yes No 6 All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations. Yes No 7 The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science. Yes No 8 Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject. Yes No 9 Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups. Yes No 10 Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students. Yes No

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsVersion en ligne

Comparing outcomes in young learners

par rimmi gupta

The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students.

Yes

Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups.

Yes

Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education.

Yes

Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms.

Yes

Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils.

Yes

All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations.

Yes

The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science.

Yes

Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject.

Yes

Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups.

Yes

Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students.

Yes

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School Achievements

Oui ou Non

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Oui ou Non

Is it true?

Oui ou Non

Adjective Checker

Oui ou Non

Grammys for best song/record

Oui ou Non

Foot and Ankle Anatomy Quiz

Oui ou Non

Is it created with Artificial Intelligence? - Complete game

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsVersion en ligne

par rimmi gupta

The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students.

Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups.

Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education.

Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms.

Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils.

All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations.

The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science.

Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject.

Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups.

Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students.

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%