Philosophical Concepts

Test

Parties jouées 1

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Philosophical Concepts

Créé par

LBoomsky Minecraft

United States

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

#	Jeux	Précision	temps
1	LBoomsky Minecraft 11 Octobre 2025	% 88	46:19

Voulez-vous apparaître dans le Top 10 de ce jeu? Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

Tissues - Practice Quiz

Benjamin D Morgan

United States

(16)

Tissues - Practice Quiz
UPS 5 Seeing Habits Quiz

Heather Bell

United States

(12)

Test your knowledge about the 5 seeing habits discussed in the text 'UPS 5 seeing habits'.
Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz

Benjamin D Morgan

United States

(39)

Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz
Spanish Alphabet Listening

Falkenberg Falkenberg

United States

(88)

Spanish alphabet, listening-based assessment
Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations

Benjamin D Morgan

United States

(14)

Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Imprimez votre jeu

Philosophical Concepts


Philosophical ConceptsVersion en ligne Philosophical Concepts par LBoomsky Minecraft 1 A set of statements where one must be true, although both cannot be true. "It is raining" and "It is not raining." a Contrary b Contradictory 2 What type of fallacy is this: "(p:) If Fiona won the lottery (x) last night, she would drive a red Ferrari (y). (p2: I saw Fiona driving a red Ferrari (y), so (c:) Fiona won the lottery (x) last night. X makes Y, yet Y doesn't have to make X, so the conclusion isn't guaranteed. a Affirming the consequent b c d 3 Knowledge dependent on empirical evidence (e.g., “the sky is blue”) a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 4 Knowledge justified independently of empirical evidence (e.g., “all bachelors are unmarried”) Could be intuitively obvious or definitionally true. a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 5 An inference to the best explanation, in other words, the reasoning that generates a hypothesis of the most plausible explanation. a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 6 A statement which is true by definition. Like "all bacholars are unmarried" Or "it is raining or it is not raining" a a priori b a posteriori c Tautology d Abduction 7 The scientific model where you start with a hypothesis and a set of given conditions, deduce what facts follow from them and then conduct experiments to see if those facts hold. To see if it is true or false. a hypothetico-deductive method b c d 8 The object you are being told information about, like "the (apple) is red." a Subject b Predicate c d 9 The information being stated about a subject, like "the apple is (red)." a Subject b Predicate c d 10 An idea which is not a single object, but is a concept to describe a variety of other things which are in themselves logically unproblematic Abstractions are logical constructions that dont actually exist like "the average british person" while constructions discribe things that do exist, like a chair or the internet. a Logical Constructions b Reduction c d 11 To look at how something works from a more fundamental level. Like how, we know why stuff boils at certain temperatures by looking further down at the molecular level. a Logical Constructions b Reduction c Heuristic Device d 12 Rule of logic stating that if a conditional statement (If P, then Q) is true, and its first part (the antecedent, P) is also true, then the second part (the consequent, Q) must also be true. "If it is raining, then the street is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the street is wet" a Modus ponens b Modus tollens c d 13 Rule of logic that states if a conditional statement ("if P, then Q") is true, and the consequent (Q) is false, then the antecedent (P) must also be false. It is also known as "denying the consequent" and is expressed in the structure: "If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P" If it is raining (P), then the ground is wet (Q). The ground is not wet (not Q). Therefore, it is not raining (not P) a Modus ponens b Modus tollens c d

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Philosophical Concepts

Test

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Test

Tissues - Practice Quiz

Test

UPS 5 Seeing Habits Quiz

Test

Photosynthesis vs Cellular Respiration - Practice Quiz

Test

Spanish Alphabet Listening

Test

Practice Quiz - Punnett Square, Variation, and Mutations

Philosophical ConceptsVersion en ligne

par LBoomsky Minecraft

A set of statements where one must be true, although both cannot be true. "It is raining" and "It is not raining."

What type of fallacy is this: "(p:) If Fiona won the lottery (x) last night, she would drive a red Ferrari (y). (p2: I saw Fiona driving a red Ferrari (y), so (c:) Fiona won the lottery (x) last night. X makes Y, yet Y doesn't have to make X, so the conclusion isn't guaranteed.

Knowledge dependent on empirical evidence (e.g., “the sky is blue”)

Knowledge justified independently of empirical evidence (e.g., “all bachelors are unmarried”) Could be intuitively obvious or definitionally true.

An inference to the best explanation, in other words, the reasoning that generates a hypothesis of the most plausible explanation.

A statement which is true by definition. Like "all bacholars are unmarried" Or "it is raining or it is not raining"

The scientific model where you start with a hypothesis and a set of given conditions, deduce what facts follow from them and then conduct experiments to see if those facts hold. To see if it is true or false.

The object you are being told information about, like "the (apple) is red."

The information being stated about a subject, like "the apple is (red)."

To look at how something works from a more fundamental level. Like how, we know why stuff boils at certain temperatures by looking further down at the molecular level.

Rule of logic stating that if a conditional statement (If P, then Q) is true, and its first part (the antecedent, P) is also true, then the second part (the consequent, Q) must also be true. "If it is raining, then the street is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the street is wet"