GEC107 - Ethics (Part 1)

Ordonner les Mots

(23)

Parties jouées 1077

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

This interactive quiz is designed to test the reading materials for Module One: Historical Development of Ethical Inquiry

Créé par

Deborah Trexie Torres

Philippines

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

#	Jeux	Précision	temps
1	Joseph Miles Cabaluna 29 Août 2025	% 100	02:39
2	J Von Vincent Verdadero 29 Août 2025	% 100	02:50
3	Ray Niño A. Comendador 28 Août 2025	% 100	03:06
4	Chelsea Duran 28 Août 2025	% 100	03:12
5	Fretzy Janna S. Lagura 28 Août 2025	% 100	03:14
6	LOUISE ALDRIN BAYOG 28 Août 2025	% 100	03:16
7	miguel macariola 28 Août 2025	% 100	03:17
8	Jay Casas 31 Août 2025	% 100	03:17
9	Sai Dorothy Cabasa 27 Août 2025	% 100	03:19
10	ARACO, JONATHAN 30 Août 2025	% 100	03:20

Voulez-vous apparaître dans le Top 10 de ce jeu? Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Imprimez votre jeu

GEC107 - Ethics (Part 1)


Ordonner les Mots GEC107 - Ethics (Part 1)Version en ligne This interactive quiz is designed to test the reading materials for Module One: Historical Development of Ethical Inquiry par Deborah Trexie Torres 1 There are numerous theories as to why human beings have to live by rules which frustrate their individual desires. One of them is: and groups disagreements among and Primal individuals clashes . . 2 Asking where ethics come from is like asking: we obey Why rules do ? ? 3 In its origin in Social Contract, coming from the Greeks and from Thomas Hobbes, our pre-ethical state is solitude (alone-ness), and primal disaster strucks when people began to meet each other. Thomas Hobess puts this conflist as: every every man against man of A war . . 4 Survival itself, let alone social order, can only be possible through: even Following with rules reluctance . . 5 Originating in the Fall of Man, according to Christians, morality is necessary in order for us to: of with will the Be in line God . . 6 Midgley presented the two arguments why morality does not arise from self-interest. The first reason is: not People are prudent always good or . . 7 Midgley presented the two arguments why morality does not arise from self-interest. The second reason is: People different reasons can for do 'good' . . 8 As of today, the most usual form of argument for individualism rests on the idea of survival of the fittest because: them into egoistic shaped Competition between isolated individuals beings . . 9 There are two main arguments why "Survival of the Fittest" cannot work as an ethical theory that justifies extreme individualism. The first one is that competition is real but only necessarily limited. Why? harmonious life - All which depend systems cooperation necessary processes to complex on is create . - . 10 Why is it that conscious life is more often cooperative than competitive? first in all' really of place the there the If developed , is natural all biosphere 'war against never could a have . , . 11 There are two main arguments why "Survival of the fittest" cannot work as an ethical theory that justifies extreme individualism. The second one is against the glorification of human ideals such as: Popular as myth ladder in - apex the man Darwinian evolutionary the that version presents pseudo the of . - . 12 What did Kant mean when he wrote: "The more we come in contact with animals the more we love them, for we see how great is their care for their young. It is then difficult for us to be cruel in thought even to a wolf." We cannot be exclusive egoists social reciprocation and like in , society , Because cooperation traits order are to caring important maintain . , , . 13 We are beings who set our own lives, so we need to arbitrate the conflicts that arise from it. But we need to do it in a way that is coherent and continuous, this means . . . or rules principles Accepting lasting . . 14 If we are somehow biased to our selected kin (family ties, species ties, relationship ties) in order to survive, how can we do our moral responsibility towards the others? recognizing wider biases systematically correcting duties By through . . 15 Why is it that morality needs common standards, common ideals, common tastes, common priorities, shared joys and sorrows that require active sympathy? the to is Morality for shared willingness solutions capacity and look . .

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

GEC107 - Ethics (Part 1)

Ordonner les Mots

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Ordonner les Mots

Put the words in correct order

Ordonner les Mots

Rearranging Words

Ordonner les Mots

Order Words

Ordonner les Mots

Blood Flow Order

Ordonner les Mots

GEC107 - Ethics (Part 1)Version en ligne

par Deborah Trexie Torres

There are numerous theories as to why human beings have to live by rules which frustrate their individual desires. One of them is:

Asking where ethics come from is like asking:

In its origin in Social Contract, coming from the Greeks and from Thomas Hobbes, our pre-ethical state is solitude (alone-ness), and primal disaster strucks when people began to meet each other. Thomas Hobess puts this conflist as:

Survival itself, let alone social order, can only be possible through:

Originating in the Fall of Man, according to Christians, morality is necessary in order for us to:

Midgley presented the two arguments why morality does not arise from self-interest. The first reason is:

Midgley presented the two arguments why morality does not arise from self-interest. The second reason is:

As of today, the most usual form of argument for individualism rests on the idea of survival of the fittest because:

There are two main arguments why "Survival of the Fittest" cannot work as an ethical theory that justifies extreme individualism. The first one is that competition is real but only necessarily limited. Why?

Why is it that conscious life is more often cooperative than competitive?

There are two main arguments why "Survival of the fittest" cannot work as an ethical theory that justifies extreme individualism. The second one is against the glorification of human ideals such as:

What did Kant mean when he wrote: "The more we come in contact with animals the more we love them, for we see how great is their care for their young. It is then difficult for us to be cruel in thought even to a wolf." We cannot be exclusive egoists

We are beings who set our own lives, so we need to arbitrate the conflicts that arise from it. But we need to do it in a way that is coherent and continuous, this means . . .

If we are somehow biased to our selected kin (family ties, species ties, relationship ties) in order to survive, how can we do our moral responsibility towards the others?

Why is it that morality needs common standards, common ideals, common tastes, common priorities, shared joys and sorrows that require active sympathy?