Fraud Refresh

Froggy Jumps

Parties jouées 12

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Quick fun game to refresh

Créé par

Tammi

United States

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi


Froggy Jumps Fraud RefreshVersion en ligne Quick fun game to refresh par Tammi 1 FDWC Case shows cardholder name listed as "Tom Smith Jr.". What name can we accept from the cardholder for verification? a Thomas Smith Jr. b Tom Smith c Thomas Smith 2 Which transactions do we NOT need to verify? a AS b HO c TA/TN 3 If cardholder is unable to verify the alert and wants more time to research, we can work the case as UCF without reviewing the other required transactions since they will be calling back. a True b False c Only if we add notes to verify the others at call back. 4 If call comes through as verified and the caller provides they are calling for their spouse's card we can still proceed since the call was already authenticated. a Yes, since it came through as verified, we can proceed with whoever is on the phone. b No, we need to refer to FI. c No, we need to check if the cardholder is available before proceeding verification. 5 If cardholder provides they have recently attempted a shipping and handling deal, then the alert will be considered as valid. a We would ask more questions to ensure the timestamps, amounts, & merchant name can be associated. b Yes, if they have recently provided their card we wouldn't consider this to be fraud. c No, they would have needed to attempt the transaction same day of the alert.

Froggy Jumps

Fraud RefreshVersion en ligne

Quick fun game to refresh

par Tammi

FDWC Case shows cardholder name listed as "Tom Smith Jr.". What name can we accept from the cardholder for verification?

Thomas Smith Jr.

Tom Smith

Thomas Smith

Which transactions do we NOT need to verify?

TA/TN

If cardholder is unable to verify the alert and wants more time to research, we can work the case as UCF without reviewing the other required transactions since they will be calling back.

True

False

Only if we add notes to verify the others at call back.

If call comes through as verified and the caller provides they are calling for their spouse's card we can still proceed since the call was already authenticated.

Yes, since it came through as verified, we can proceed with whoever is on the phone.

No, we need to refer to FI.

No, we need to check if the cardholder is available before proceeding verification.

If cardholder provides they have recently attempted a shipping and handling deal, then the alert will be considered as valid.

We would ask more questions to ensure the timestamps, amounts, & merchant name can be associated.

Yes, if they have recently provided their card we wouldn't consider this to be fraud.

No, they would have needed to attempt the transaction same day of the alert.

Vous pouvez intégrer le jeu dans un LMS compatible avec LTI 1.1 ou LTI 1.3 comme Canvas, Moodle ou Blackboard. Les scores seront ainsi automatiquement enregistrés dans le carnet de notes de la plateforme.

Fraud Refresh

Froggy Jumps

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Froggy Jumps

Phlebotomy Order of Draw Quiz

Froggy Jumps

pizza

Froggy Jumps

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos Quiz

Froggy Jumps

Bill of Rights Game - The Constitutionalist

Froggy Jumps

The Integumentary System

Froggy Jumps

Fraud RefreshVersion en ligne

par Tammi

FDWC Case shows cardholder name listed as "Tom Smith Jr.". What name can we accept from the cardholder for verification?

Which transactions do we NOT need to verify?

If cardholder is unable to verify the alert and wants more time to research, we can work the case as UCF without reviewing the other required transactions since they will be calling back.

If call comes through as verified and the caller provides they are calling for their spouse's card we can still proceed since the call was already authenticated.

If cardholder provides they have recently attempted a shipping and handling deal, then the alert will be considered as valid.

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%