Icon Créer jeu Créer jeu

Evaluating Credible Sources

Oui ou Non

(1)
In this game, players will assess various nouns to determine whether they are considered credible sources of information. Players will respond with ✅ for credible sources and ❌ for non-credible sources. Test your knowledge and improve your ability to discern reliable information!

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

86 fois fait

Créé par

United States

Top 10 résultats

  1. 1
    Sarah B
    Sarah B
    00:45
    temps
    100
    but
  2. 2
    Selina
    Selina
    00:55
    temps
    100
    but
  3. 3
    Caroline
    Caroline
    01:10
    temps
    100
    but
  4. 4
    Ella S
    Ella S
    01:27
    temps
    100
    but
  5. 5
    sam
    sam
    01:30
    temps
    100
    but
  6. 6
    01:17
    temps
    98
    but
  7. 7
    Marissa
    Marissa
    01:26
    temps
    98
    but
  8. 8
    Abby M
    Abby M
    01:12
    temps
    95
    but
  9. 9
    Ellie
    Ellie
    01:26
    temps
    93
    but
  10. 10
    01:54
    temps
    93
    but
Voulez-vous apparaître dans le Top 10 de ce jeu? pour vous identifier.
Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu
Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Top Jeux

  1. temps
    but
  1. temps
    but
temps
but
temps
but
 
game-icon

Evaluating Credible SourcesVersion en ligne

In this game, players will assess various nouns to determine whether they are considered credible sources of information. Players will respond with ✅ for credible sources and ❌ for non-credible sources. Test your knowledge and improve your ability to discern reliable information!

par Clarissia Morrow
1

Random YouTube video

2

Opinion piece

3

Reputable news outlet

4

Wikipedia

5

Anonymous forum

6

Academic book

7

Unverified news site

8

Government report

9

Peer-reviewed journal

10

Personal blog

11

University website

12

Expert interview

13

Social media post

14

Professional association

15

Clickbait article

16

Research paper

17

Conspiracy theory website

18

Library database

19

Spam email

20

Nonprofit organization

21

Anonymous forum

22

Non-profit organization

23

Research paper

24

Academic book

25

Clickbait headline

26

Reputable news outlet

27

Library archive

28

Personal blog

29

Peer-reviewed journal

30

University website

31

Unverified news article

32

Conspiracy theory website

33

Opinion piece without sources

34

Expert interview

35

Commercial website

36

Social media post

37

Government report

38

Unpublished manuscript

39

Statistical database

40

Wikipedia

educaplay suscripción