Logic & Reasoning Vocab

Mots Croisés

Parties jouées 1

Créer une copie

À propos de cette activité

Test your knowledge of terms used in the discussion of logic and reasoning for critical thinking.

Créé par

Michelle Hansen Little

United States

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! Connectez-vous pour vous identifier.

Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu

Créez mots croisés

Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Créer un défi


Mots Croisés Logic & Reasoning VocabVersion en ligne Test your knowledge of terms used in the discussion of logic and reasoning for critical thinking. par Michelle Hansen Little 1 An error in reasoning that occurs when a conclusion is based on too little evidence or when the gap between the evidence and conclusion is too wide. 2 A fallacy that makes an illogical assumption that a statement is self-evident (or true) when it actually requires proof. 3 The tendency that people have to accept information that supports their own beliefs and to ignore information that does not. 4 Faulty reasoning that presents only two choices when there are actually three or more choices. 5 A fallacy using two different meanings for the same key term in an argument. 6 Illogical reasoning that occurs when a conclusion does not follow from the premises or is supported by weak or irrelevant evidence or by no evidence at all. 7 An unfair tactic of argument in which the writer misrepresents evidence—for example, by presenting an opponent’s view inaccurately or by exaggerating his or her position. 8 Biased or misleading information that is spread about a particular viewpoint, person, or cause. 9 A model for deductive reasoning that includes a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. 10 An appeal attempting to convince people that something is true because it is widely held to be true. 11 A form of reasoning that begins with specific observations (or evidence) and moves to a general conclusion. 12 A statement that uses what is known to draw a conclusion about what is unknown. 13 A form of reasoning that moves from general statements (or premises) to specific conclusions. 14 The logical fallacy of undermining an argument by attacking the person who is making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself. 15 An intentional oversimplification of an opposing argument to make it easier to refute. 16 An unfair tactic that makes an argument appear stronger by presenting only evidence that supports a particular position and ignoring evidence that challenges it. 17 A personal judgment; therefore, an idea that is open to debate. 18 An appeal to the emotions. 19 An appeal to the trustworthiness or credibility of a speaker or writer. 20 An appeal to logic. 19 17 14 13 8 20 2 6 7 1 10 4 3 18 15 11 5 12 16

Mots Croisés

Logic & Reasoning VocabVersion en ligne

Test your knowledge of terms used in the discussion of logic and reasoning for critical thinking.

par Michelle Hansen Little

An error in reasoning that occurs when a conclusion is based on too little evidence or when the gap between the evidence and conclusion is too wide.

A fallacy that makes an illogical assumption that a statement is self-evident (or true) when it actually requires proof.

The tendency that people have to accept information that supports their own beliefs and to ignore information that does not.

Faulty reasoning that presents only two choices when there are actually three or more choices.

A fallacy using two different meanings for the same key term in an argument.

Illogical reasoning that occurs when a conclusion does not follow from the premises or is supported by weak or irrelevant evidence or by no evidence at all.

An unfair tactic of argument in which the writer misrepresents evidence—for example, by presenting an opponent’s view inaccurately or by exaggerating his or her position.

Biased or misleading information that is spread about a particular viewpoint, person, or cause.

A model for deductive reasoning that includes a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.

An appeal attempting to convince people that something is true because it is widely held to be true.

A form of reasoning that begins with specific observations (or evidence) and moves to a general conclusion.

A statement that uses what is known to draw a conclusion about what is unknown.

A form of reasoning that moves from general statements (or premises) to specific conclusions.

The logical fallacy of undermining an argument by attacking the person who is making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself.

An intentional oversimplification of an opposing argument to make it easier to refute.

An unfair tactic that makes an argument appear stronger by presenting only evidence that supports a particular position and ignoring evidence that challenges it.

		%
	Anonyme	%
		%
		%

Logic & Reasoning Vocab

Mots Croisés

À propos de cette activité

Créé par

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Top Jeux

Mots Croisés

Disney Characters

Mots Croisés

Country- flag crossword

Mots Croisés

Grey's Anatomy crossword

Mots Croisés

Taylor Swift Crossword

Mots Croisés

IATA Airport Codes I

Mots Mêlés

Los Cognados

Mots Croisés

Logic & Reasoning VocabVersion en ligne

par Michelle Hansen Little

An error in reasoning that occurs when a conclusion is based on too little evidence or when the gap between the evidence and conclusion is too wide.

A fallacy that makes an illogical assumption that a statement is self-evident (or true) when it actually requires proof.

The tendency that people have to accept information that supports their own beliefs and to ignore information that does not.

Faulty reasoning that presents only two choices when there are actually three or more choices.

A fallacy using two different meanings for the same key term in an argument.

Illogical reasoning that occurs when a conclusion does not follow from the premises or is supported by weak or irrelevant evidence or by no evidence at all.

An unfair tactic of argument in which the writer misrepresents evidence—for example, by presenting an opponent’s view inaccurately or by exaggerating his or her position.

Biased or misleading information that is spread about a particular viewpoint, person, or cause.

A model for deductive reasoning that includes a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.

An appeal attempting to convince people that something is true because it is widely held to be true.

A form of reasoning that begins with specific observations (or evidence) and moves to a general conclusion.

A statement that uses what is known to draw a conclusion about what is unknown.

A form of reasoning that moves from general statements (or premises) to specific conclusions.

The logical fallacy of undermining an argument by attacking the person who is making the argument instead of addressing the argument itself.

An intentional oversimplification of an opposing argument to make it easier to refute.

An unfair tactic that makes an argument appear stronger by presenting only evidence that supports a particular position and ignoring evidence that challenges it.

A personal judgment; therefore, an idea that is open to debate.

An appeal to the emotions.

An appeal to the trustworthiness or credibility of a speaker or writer.

An appeal to logic.