Icon Créer jeu Créer jeu

Session 05- MitM Attacks II

Compléter

Subject : Security and Privacy Risks in Computer & Internet Applications
Lecturer: Assoc. Prof. Dr. James Joshi
Faculty: Graduate School of Information Technology
Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Âge recommandé: 21 ans
0 fois fait

Créé par

Thailand

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! pour vous identifier.
Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu
Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Top Jeux

  1. temps
    but
  1. temps
    but
temps
but
temps
but
 
game-icon

Compléter

Session 05- MitM Attacks IIVersion en ligne

Subject : Security and Privacy Risks in Computer & Internet Applications Lecturer: Assoc. Prof. Dr. James Joshi Faculty: Graduate School of Information Technology Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand

par Prince Parham
1

intercept cryptographic authentication relays Public keys JavaScript eavesdropping

1 . Based on the " Mitigating a Fallacy " rules :
Executing on victim = = executing an attack

2 . The man - in - the - middle attack ( often abbreviated MitM , also known as a bucket brigade attack , or sometimes Janus attack ) in cryptography and computer security is a form of active in which the attacker makes independent connections with the victims and messages between them , making them believe that they are talking directly to each other over a private connection , when in fact the entire conversation is controlled by the attacker .

3 . The attacker must be able to all messages going between the two victims and inject new ones , which is straightforward in many circumstances ( for example , an attacker within reception range of an unencrypted Wi - Fi wireless access point , can insert himself as a man - in - the - middle ) .

4 . A man - in - the - middle attack can succeed only when the attacker can impersonate each endpoint to the satisfaction of the other ? it is an attack on mutual ( or lack thereof ) . Most protocols include some form of endpoint authentication specifically to prevent MITM attacks . For example , SSL can authenticate one or both parties using a mutually trusted certification authority .

5 . Various defenses against MITM attacks use authentication techniques that are based on the key infrastructures .

6 . Stronger mutual authentication , such as :
Secret ( which are usually high information entropy secrets , and thus more secure ) , or
Passwords ( which are usually low information entropy secrets , and thus less secure ) .

educaplay suscripción