Relier Pairs Steps in a Mock Trial Matching GameVersion en ligne Match the Steps in a Mock Trial with their definition by clicking on the step and then clicking on the definition. Start with step 1 and end with step 10. This activity is for high school students. par Arizona Bar Foundation 1 Step 9 - Closing Argument-Defendant 2 Step 3 - Defendant Opening Statement 3 Step 5 - Cross-Examination by the Defendant’s Attorney 4 Step 8 - Closing Argument-Prosecution/Plaintiff 5 Step 10 - Judge’s Verdict 6 Step 4 - Direct Examination by Prosecution/Plaintiff 7 Step 1 - Opening of the Court 8 Step 2 - Prosecution/Plaintiff Opening Statement 9 Step 6 - Direct Examination by the Defendant’s Attorneys 10 Step 7 - Cross-Examination by the Prosecutor/Plaintiff’s Attorney The prosecutors/plaintiff’s attorney conduct the direct examination of its own witnesses. At this time, testimony and other evidence to prove the prosecution’s (plaintiff’s) case will be represented. The purpose is to allow the witnesses to state the facts in support of the case. In trials held without a jury, the judge determines the facts of the case and renders a judgment. The closing argument for the defense reviews the evidence as presented, indicates how the evidence does not satisfy the elements of the charge or claim, stresses the facts favorable to the defense and asks for a verdict favorable to the defense. The closing argument is a review of the evidence presented. It should indicate how the evidence has satisfied the elements of the charge or claim, point out the law applicable to the case, and ask for a favorable verdict. The cross-examiner seeks to clarify or cast doubt upon the testimony of opposing witnesses. Inconsistency in stories, bias, and other damaging facts may be pointed out to the judge through cross-examination. The prosecutor in a criminal case (or plaintiff’s attorney in a civil case) summarizes the evidence which will be presented to prove the case. The Clerk of the Court of the judge will call the Court to order. When the judge enters, all of the participants should stand until the judge is seated. The case is announced and the judge asks the attorney for each side if they are ready. A representative from each team introduces and identifies each member of the team and the role each will play. The defendant’s attorney in a criminal or civil case summarizes the evidence for the Court which will be presented to rebut the case the prosecution/plaintiff’s attorney has made. The cross-examiner seeks to clarify or cast doubt upon the testimony of opposing witnesses. Inconsistency in stories, bias, and other damaging facts may be pointed out to the judge through cross-examination. Defense conducts the direct examination of its own witnesses. At this time, testimony and other evidence to prove the defendant’s case will be represented. The purpose is to allow the witnesses to state the facts in support of the case.
Créer jeu