Icon Créer jeu Créer jeu

sbadv20

Compléter

gap fill for reading 4

Téléchargez la version pour jouer sur papier

Âge recommandé: 15 ans
0 fois fait

Créé par

South Korea

Top 10 résultats

Il n'y a toujours pas de résultats pour ce jeu. Soyez le premier à apparaître dans le classement! pour vous identifier.
Créez votre propre jeu gratuite à partir de notre créateur de jeu
Affrontez vos amis pour voir qui obtient le meilleur score dans ce jeu

Top Jeux

  1. temps
    but
  1. temps
    but
temps
but
temps
but
 
game-icon

Compléter

sbadv20Version en ligne

gap fill for reading 4

par John E
1

posed collapse about exchange uniquely because possible when biologically of learning from engineering cottoned influenced order mistakes 'bargains'

Humans are smart among all the other species on the planet . We are capable of outstanding feats of technology and . Then why are we so prone to making ? And why do we tend to make the same ones time and time again ? When Primate Psychologist Laurie Santos the Comparative Cognition Lab at Yale University this question to her team , they were thinking in particular the errors of judgement which led to the recent of the financial markets . Santos came to two answers to this question . Either humans have designed environments which are too complex for us to fully understand , or we are prone to making bad decisions .
In order to test these theories , the team selected a group of Brown Capuchin monkeys . Monkeys were selected for the test , as distant relatives of humans , they are intelligent and have the capacity to learn . However , they are not by any of the technological or cultural environments which affect human decision - making . The team wanted to test whether the capuchin monkeys , put into similar situations as humans , would make the same mistakes .
[ A ] Of particular interest to the scientists was whether monkeys would make the same mistakes when making financial decisions . [ B ] In to find out , they had to introduce the monkeys to money . [ C ] The monkeys soon on , and as well as simple exchange techniques , were soon able to distinguish ? If one team - member offered two grapes in for a metal disc and another team - member offered one grape , the monkeys chose the two - grape option . [ D ] Interestingly , when the data the monkey's purchasing strategies was compared with economist's data on human behaviour , there was a perfect match .

educaplay suscripción