Relier Pairs Social implcations of stuides Version en ligne fasfsakfjsakfjslakf par Rebecca Humphreys 1 CAUSED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM 2 THE RESEARCH HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE DANGERS OF EWT ,HOW? 3 PARTICIPANTS COULD NOT GIVE FULL CONSENT, SO WHAT DID THEY GIVE? 4 WHY MIGHT THE STUDY LACK VALIDITY? 5 THE RESEARCH HAS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS- HOW MUCH COULD IT SAVE THE UK ECONOMY BY IMPROVING THE SYSTEMS? ££££££££££££££££££££ 6 DECIEVED PARTICIPANTS 7 HOW HAS LOFTUS AND PALMER HELPED WITH IMPROVING SAFEGUARDS IN THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM? 8 WHAT HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF PEOPLES UNDERSTANDING OF INACCURATE EWT? 9 HOW WAS DECEPTION JUSTIFIED ? Watched a video of a film of a car accident . THEY GAVE PRESUMPTIVE CONSENT - 7.7 % OF THE UKS GDP ON RETRIALS!!! THERE WAS ONLY MILD DECEPTION WITH LIMITED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM. DONE TO AVOID DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPROVE THE I VALIDITY OF THE STUDY. PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT AWARE OF THE FULL AIMS OF THE STUDY E.G. ASSESSING THE USE OF LEADING QUESTIONS ONF ACCURACY OF RECALL.
Créer jeu