Relier Pairs Social implcations of stuides Version en ligne fasfsakfjsakfjslakf par Rebecca Humphreys 1 PARTICIPANTS COULD NOT GIVE FULL CONSENT, SO WHAT DID THEY GIVE? 2 WHAT HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF PEOPLES UNDERSTANDING OF INACCURATE EWT? 3 HOW WAS DECEPTION JUSTIFIED ? 4 THE RESEARCH HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE DANGERS OF EWT ,HOW? 5 THE RESEARCH HAS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS- HOW MUCH COULD IT SAVE THE UK ECONOMY BY IMPROVING THE SYSTEMS? ££££££££££££££££££££ 6 HOW HAS LOFTUS AND PALMER HELPED WITH IMPROVING SAFEGUARDS IN THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM? 7 WHY MIGHT THE STUDY LACK VALIDITY? 8 CAUSED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM 9 DECIEVED PARTICIPANTS THERE WAS ONLY MILD DECEPTION WITH LIMITED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM. DONE TO AVOID DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPROVE THE I VALIDITY OF THE STUDY. 7.7 % OF THE UKS GDP ON RETRIALS!!! Watched a video of a film of a car accident . THEY GAVE PRESUMPTIVE CONSENT - PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT AWARE OF THE FULL AIMS OF THE STUDY E.G. ASSESSING THE USE OF LEADING QUESTIONS ONF ACCURACY OF RECALL.
Créer jeu