Relier Pairs Social implcations of stuides Version en ligne fasfsakfjsakfjslakf par Rebecca Humphreys 1 PARTICIPANTS COULD NOT GIVE FULL CONSENT, SO WHAT DID THEY GIVE? 2 HOW HAS LOFTUS AND PALMER HELPED WITH IMPROVING SAFEGUARDS IN THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM? 3 HOW WAS DECEPTION JUSTIFIED ? 4 WHAT HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF PEOPLES UNDERSTANDING OF INACCURATE EWT? 5 CAUSED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM 6 THE RESEARCH HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE DANGERS OF EWT ,HOW? 7 DECIEVED PARTICIPANTS 8 WHY MIGHT THE STUDY LACK VALIDITY? 9 THE RESEARCH HAS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS- HOW MUCH COULD IT SAVE THE UK ECONOMY BY IMPROVING THE SYSTEMS? ££££££££££££££££££££ 7.7 % OF THE UKS GDP ON RETRIALS!!! PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT AWARE OF THE FULL AIMS OF THE STUDY E.G. ASSESSING THE USE OF LEADING QUESTIONS ONF ACCURACY OF RECALL. THEY GAVE PRESUMPTIVE CONSENT - Watched a video of a film of a car accident . THERE WAS ONLY MILD DECEPTION WITH LIMITED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM. DONE TO AVOID DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPROVE THE I VALIDITY OF THE STUDY.
Créer jeu