Relier Pairs Social implcations of stuides Version en ligne fasfsakfjsakfjslakf par Rebecca Humphreys 1 THE RESEARCH HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE DANGERS OF EWT ,HOW? 2 HOW HAS LOFTUS AND PALMER HELPED WITH IMPROVING SAFEGUARDS IN THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM? 3 THE RESEARCH HAS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS- HOW MUCH COULD IT SAVE THE UK ECONOMY BY IMPROVING THE SYSTEMS? ££££££££££££££££££££ 4 PARTICIPANTS COULD NOT GIVE FULL CONSENT, SO WHAT DID THEY GIVE? 5 CAUSED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM 6 DECIEVED PARTICIPANTS 7 WHY MIGHT THE STUDY LACK VALIDITY? 8 HOW WAS DECEPTION JUSTIFIED ? 9 WHAT HAS HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF PEOPLES UNDERSTANDING OF INACCURATE EWT? 7.7 % OF THE UKS GDP ON RETRIALS!!! THEY GAVE PRESUMPTIVE CONSENT - PARTICIPANTS WERE NOT AWARE OF THE FULL AIMS OF THE STUDY E.G. ASSESSING THE USE OF LEADING QUESTIONS ONF ACCURACY OF RECALL. THERE WAS ONLY MILD DECEPTION WITH LIMITED PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM. DONE TO AVOID DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPROVE THE I VALIDITY OF THE STUDY. Watched a video of a film of a car accident .
Créer jeu